Municipal governments are the silent partners in Canadian citizens' lives. The services they provide underpin our way of life, but too often their performance is falling short of international best practices.
The Local Government Performance Index, an analysis by the Frontier Centre for Public Policy, a western Canadian think-tank, has found that our cities are suffering from more than just a lack of attention. Poor public disclosure, archaic accounting and vast performance differences from city to city paint an unflattering picture.
A quick glance at the municipal financial statements shows Canada's 30 largest municipalities are doing a highly variable job of managing important, but taken-for-granted, services. Public disclosure of municipal finances is often inadequate, and the resulting lack of information makes analysis - not to mention their assessment by municipal stakeholders -- next to impossible.
With such weak information systems, municipalities cannot hope to recognize and recover the costs of operating and replacing vital infrastructure.
The failure of bridges, water and wastewater systems are directly related to poor information about assets and their condition. Such information gaps effectively obscure the substantial capital funding required to make up shortfalls in asset maintenance, renewal and replacement.
In a new study, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities estimated that the infrastructure deficit grew over four years from $60 billion to an estimated $123 billion. Because only half the municipalities surveyed responded, that figure can at best be considered a guesstimate. If true, however, it would equate to a funding requirement of between $1,800 and $3,700 per person.
To meet this challenge, cities could benefit by supplementing, or even replacing, traditional debt sources with innovative privately funded mechanisms. These include public/private partnerships or their variants including fund, design and build schemes.
But we need to put this problem into context. The level of municipal debt as a proportion of median household income in Canada was 2.9% in 2005, or about $1,800 per household -- low by most standards.
While there are some star performers, many Canadian municipalities are underperforming in absolute terms and in comparison to overseas counterparts. Many are using accounting standards and asset management reporting that were replaced long ago in other jurisdictions with full accrual accounting and asset management best practices.
Next page:Substantial variations among Canadian municipalities
Related content:
Four steps to innovative service transformation
U.K. politicians urge more haste on data sharing
Moving beyond consultation - Meaningful engagement comes at a price
icon.
