Vendor backs out of million dollar evoting dealBy: Marc L. Songini(02/01/06)
Election officials in Florida's Leon County are scrambling to
comply with state and federal voting laws after the county's
preferred vendor for optical scan voting systems backed out of an
informal deal.
The Leon County Commission had turned to Election Systems and
Software Inc. (ES&S) after voting last month to replace 160
AccuVote optical scan voting machines from Diebold Election Systems
Inc. because of fears that the AccuVote machines may not comply
with laws on handicapped accessibility. The commission also
questioned the accuracy of the Diebold machines.
ES&S had informally agreed to a US$1.8 million deal to supply
its AutoMark optical scan gear to Leon County. The county had
expected that the equipment would help it meet the requirements of
the federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA) and Florida election
laws.
All U.S. voting precincts were required by HAVA to have
touch-screen or specially equipped optical-scan devices by Jan. 1,
2006. Leon County Elections Supervisor Ion Sancho said last week
that he doesn't expect to face penalties as long as the county is
working to get equipment.
Sancho said that he couldn't explain why Omaha-based ES&S
backed out of the proposed deal, which had included agreements on
price, terms and equipment.
In an e-mail statement, ES&S also offered no specific reasons
for its decision. "Toward the end of last year, we were presented
with the possibility of entering into a long-term relationship with
the county," an ES&S spokesman said. "After a great deal of
careful consideration, we made the decision [on Dec. 29] not to
enter into an agreement to provide equipment and services to the
county.
"After evaluating all of the information available to us at the
time, we determined that we were unlikely to have an effective
partnership with the county," the spokesman said.
The county had expected to have ES&S voting systems in place
for the next federal election and to gain federal grant money to
help pay for them.
Sancho said approval of any federal grants for the equipment is now
in jeopardy as the county begins a new search for voting machines
that meet state and federal guidelines. The options include once
again turning to Diebold equipment or choosing another vendor, he
said.
"At this point, it's not clear what we'll do," said Sancho. "I've
got two major entities in the elections business that simply don't
have the time to deal with Leon County."
Sancho has been public with his doubts about the reliability of
electronic voting gear; he even sponsored test hacks into the
county's Diebold AccuVote optical scan systems -- a move that led
to a somewhat strained relationship with Allen, Texas-based
Diebold.
|
|
Have something to say about this article?   
Find an inappropriate comment? You can notify the moderator by clicking the icon.
  |  |  | | Blog Spotlight: Sandford Borins |  | As Professor of Strategic Management at the University of Toronto, Sandford Borins brings InterGovWorld.com readers exclusive insights into how and why the public sector is changing. You'll find new perspectives and questions, observations and objectives, lessons and answers. Cover to Cover, the blog by Prof. Sandford Borins, appears every Thursday. Inside Cover to Cover | |
|  | | Unified Communications |  | Unity is a word often heard in the public sector, with myriad agencies and departments looking to foster collective thinking around some of today's most pressing issues. The word, however, doesn't usually get mentioned in the same breath as technology. That's a situation, though, that might soon be changing, thanks to a new software platform known as unified communications.
| |
|  |  |  |  |
|
| | | |
| | |  |  | Knowledge Centres at a Glance |  | | | | |  | |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|
| |
|